Sunday, September 3, 2017

The History of Beauty and the Beast Chapter 1



Long ago in the somewhat faraway land of Burbank, a young prince stood atop a massive animation empire. Although he desired to adapt every story he loved; there were some stories in his eyes that he saw as “impossible”, so he shelved them. One of these stories centered around a mermaid and her desire to become human, as well as other works from the author known as Hans Christian Andersen. The other was based on a French novel by Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve (pardon me if I butcher the name); and it centered around a woman held prisoner by a grotesque beast whom she later learns to love. Unfortunately, due to problems pertaining to story, the project was indefinitely shelved. Many years pass, and the project was once again greenlit under the direction of Kirk Wise and Gary Trousdale. If they could overcome the problems Walt faced during the original production, then the movie’s curse would be broken; if not, it would be doomed to remain in the archives forever. Throughout its arduous production, the film was simply known… as Beauty and the Beast

The story of this Tale as Old as Time’s production begins in 1988, shortly before production on Disney’s The Little Mermaid had completed. While working on the screenplay of what would later become The Rescuers Down Under, Jim Cox was approached by Michael Eisner to create a treatment for Beauty and the Beast. Thankfully, Cox immediately accepted the offer and began work on said treatment. Afterwards, he submitted it to Michael Eisner; Eisner loved the treatment and asked the studio’s artists to work on some initial sketches (which can be seen on the early presentation reel on the final product’s DVD). He phoned Cox while the latter was visiting his wife, asking him to expand the initial treatment into a full screenplay. Unfortunately, the screenplay was rejected by Katzenberg; he claimed the script did not match the direction they had in mind.
              Initially, Cox envisioned the film as darker and more faithful to the source material than the final product would later become. Like in the final film, Maurice was a poor inventor living in a cottage in France with his daughter, Belle. However, in this draft, Belle had two sisters that would serve as the movie’s main antagonists. Serving as secondary antagonists were three suitors for Belle; an actor, an army general, and a nobleman, all competing for Belle’s hand in marriage. Belle would take her father’s place as the prisoner of a Beast after the former is imprisoned for trespassing the latter’s castle. While Belle feels happy in the castle with the company of the enchanted objects, she still feels uneasy towards the Beast; however, that would soon change after one fateful night. While exploring the forest beyond the castle grounds, Belle is attacked by a pack of wolves, similar to an event in the final film. Also similarly, the Beast would come to her rescue and possibly sustained some significant injuries. Afterwards, the two would begin to warm up to each other and later form a strong friendship. Unfortunately, while Belle enjoyed the company of her new companions, she longed to see her family once again.
Like in the original story and in the final product, Belle asks the Beast if she would be allowed to return to her family. Beast allows her to return for one night, much to her delight and his chagrin (as Belle is the key to breaking the castle’s curse). The next day, Belle returns to her family and informs them of the Beast, his castle, and his riches. However, Belle would later regret mentioning this within earshot of her sisters as they use that as motivation to the Beast’s castle; they believed if they were in control of the riches, the suitors would fall for them instead. The suitors decided to join in and kill the Beast, as the trio saw him as competition for Belle’s hand. The five villains decide to pay the castle a visit and confront its master. While Beast manages to scare off the five, he is fatally wounded and left for dead in the courtyard. Upon realizing her sisters’ deception, Belle immediately rushes back to the castle and holds a dying Beast in her arms. She kisses him and confessing her love, breaking the spell on the castle and all who lived there. As for Belle’s sisters and her suitors… they were turned into animals by Agathe, the same enchantress who transformed the young prince into a Beast. (Agathe really has a thing for turning people into animals, doesn’t she?)
Like many initial drafts of Disney films, this one seems to be significantly more faithful to the original story. However, this draft does contain some elements that would remain as production progressed onward. As mentioned in the beginning, Katzenberg desired a different direction for the film and Cox left the project despite the former saying he did a great job on the script. After Cox’s vision was silently rejected, Disney turned to Gen LeRoy and asked him to try his hand at writing a new script draft (In my honest opinion, the less that is said about this script, the better, it has almost nothing to do with the original story). Unsurprisingly, this draft was rejected as well (excellent move on Katzenberg’s part, I will give him that). After LeRoy’s draft was given a “thumbs-down” in 1989, Disney decided to hire Richard Williams (known for Who Framed Roger Rabbit, The Thief and The Cobbler, and The Animator’s Survival Kit)  as director for the film. Unfortunately, Williams declined the offer and recommended his friend and fellow animator Richard Purdum who did accept the offer.

No Animal Characters in Aladdin's Remake?!



Based on various articles floating around the internet, it seems director Guy Ritchie is wanting to replace the iconic animal characters Rajah, Iago, and possibly Abu with human characters his reboot of Aladdin
              For Rajah, it seems the tiger is being replaced with a handmaiden known as Mara. Based on these developments, it seems Mara is based on the handmaidens from the stage musical, as well as a deleted character from earlier drafts of the original film. I do not mind the change, (as first of all) it shows Guy Ritchie is attempting to bring in more elements of Howard Ashman’s intended vision of the film by repurposing these deleted characters. Also, Rajah was a very minor character in the original film; he did not contribute anything to the story and if he is indeed omitted from the reboot, it would not impact the film at all. However, Iago is another situation entirely.
              Iago made a significant contribution in the original movie’s storyline and was a member of the main cast. If Ritchie wanted to eliminate the parrot from his adaptation, he could have made the character human like in the stage musical. Unfortunately, it seems Ritchie plans to give the bird “le boot” and replace him with another character known as “Hakim”. Surprisingly, Hakim will be an amalgamation of the original film’s Razoul and the aforementioned Iago. In my opinion, I am disappointed in the change, but I can understand why the character was omitted. If Iago were to remain in his current state, it would take away from the “grounded” and “street-level” vision Guy Ritchie has for the film. However, as I stated before, Iago could have worked if he was turned into a human character like in the stage adaptation of Aladdin. If they plan to axe Rajah and Iago, then it is extremely likely the monkey known as Abu will also be eliminated from this version.
              While I am somewhat disappointed about the possibility of Abu being eliminated from the upcoming film, I am also optimistic about what characters they could put in his place. Since it seems Ritchie wants to evoke more of Ashman’s original “grounded and realistic” vision for the film, this brings up the possibility of him incorporating deleted characters Babkak, Omar, and Kassim to serve as Aladdin’s sidekicks. For those unaware, the three aforementioned characters were written into Howard Ashman’s original 1988 treatment of Aladdin and served as his sidekicks; think of them as prototypes of the monkey. However, when the movie went into production, the three were amalgamated into a singular entity. If these three characters are brought back into the fold, it would also raise the possibilities of three cut Aladdin songs being restored as well; Babkak, Omar, Aladdin, Kassim, How Quick They Forget, and the iconic High Adventure. I know wishing for the trio to be resurrected for this film is like grasping for straws, and they are probably going to give Aladdin a single sidekick like everybody else. However, Disney has surprised us before, so I am cautiously optimistic about this.
              Do you think any other characters will be eliminated or brought back from the cutting room floor? If so, leave your thoughts in the comments below and get some sort of discussion going!